I recently wrote an article for the NW Asian Weekly highlighting the E-2 and EB-5 visas. These visas highlight the options for foreign investors.
Washington State passes amendments to proposed social networking law
The Washington State Senate unanimously approved amendments to the social networking legislation. The proposed amendments would prohibit employers from coercing or requesting that employees provide them with login information for personal social networking sites.
The amendment also prohibits employers from requiring employees to “add” employers to their list of contacts of their personal social networking sites.
In addition, the amendment grants the employee or a prospective employee the opportunity to sue the employer if the employer violates the new law. There is a statutory fine of $500 plus attorney fees.
The proposed law and penalties reflect a need to protect the privacy of an employee. Of course, if the employee grants access and/or the employee’s information is readily available over the internet, then one might argue that the rules here would not apply. There are exemptions to the law which would allow an employer to seek information from an employee’s private social networking site as well. As an employee, one should be prudent about what they put on a social networking site such as Facebook and Twitter. Also, check the privacy settings on those sites to ensure that only those that you want to see your information are allowed to see it.
Cruz Law, PLLC would be happy to answer any inquiries about the new social media law.
What is Fair Use?
In U.S. Copyright law, Fair Use is a doctrine that while technically infringing on the copyright owner’s rights, there are certain exemptions considered permissible; and such fair use can be used as a defense against a claim of copyright infringement.
Some exemptions to infringement permitted under Fair Use include criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research.
According to the Copyright Act, there are four factors that will be evaluated to determine fair use:
1) Character or Purpose of Use; this includes whether work is used commercially or for nonprofit educational purposes.
2) Nature of Copyrighted Work
3) Amount and Substantiality of the Copied Work
4) Effect on the Potential Market
The factors highlighted in the Copyright Act were determined prior to the use of new technologies such as Facebook, Twitter and other forms of social and digital media. As a result, there are some big question marks when it comes to enforcement of copyrights and where and when Fair Use can be used to defend infringement.
If you have a question regarding Fair Use, do not hesitate to call or email to set up an appointment.
Can employers request your Facebook password?
The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) was blocked by members of the U.S. House of Representatives. CISPA would have banned employers from asking for social media passwords of its employees.
The bill would help the government react to cybersecurity threats by making it easier to share information between itself and private company. Some argue that it’s a major invasion of privacy as it would be easy for companies to hand over users’ private information to the government. More background on CISPA can be found with this excellent post on PC Mag.
The Washington state legislature currently has SB 5211 which proposes employer social media password legislation. There is criticism about whether this legislation is necessary. But, the law, if passed, would prevent employers from obtaining social media passwords from its employees. It also would allow a statutory cause of action with a penalty of $500 to a prevailing employee or prospective employee in addition to “any award of actual damages” plus reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. Additions to the state law include limited reasons for an employer to access a personal account or profile.
The bill is currently matriculating its way through the state House.
Court dismisses Viacom lawsuit against YouTube
A recent ruling in New York federal court may have repercussions of online use of clips on YouTube. The Court dismissed the lawsuit against YouTube for unauthorized use of clips showing Comedy Central clips of “The Daily Show” and “South Park.”
The Court ordered that You Tube was protected by the “safe harbor provisions” of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. Thus, You Tube would not be guilty of any form of copyright infringement unless it had knowledge. It would be the burden of the party making the accusation of copyright infringement and not for You Tube to disprove.
Viacom argued that YouTube used unauthorized copyrighted material to draw visitors and make it more attractive for potential buyers. The argument was that YouTube benefited via ads placed next to videos.
Viacom plans to appeal the decision.
(via New York Times)
The ruling exemplifies the push and pull between copyright law and the DMCA. Still, if you operate a YouTube channel, you could still be subject to the takedown notice provisions of the DMCA. Also, if you find someone taking your work without your permission, you could use the takedown notice to your benefit.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- …
- 21
- Next Page »